Search for: "JOHN DOE(S) 1-3"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
Does 1-14 (Phoenix, AZ) was turned over one day after John Doe #3 had filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and on the same day that John Doe #8 joined in John Doe #3's motion.We have no idea how this happened, but it would seem that (a) the University of Arizona should not have responded to the subpoena when a motion to quash the subpoena had been filed, and (b) the motions to quash aren't… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Here, John Doe's argument didn't fall into these exceptions so the Court could not (and did not) quash the subpoena.Motion to quash subpoena, denied.Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:34 am
Court Authorizes John Doe Summonses about Finnish Residents Using 3 U.S. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:34 am
Court Authorizes John Doe Summonses about Finnish Residents Using 3 U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
What's with this Kolaveri about John Doe Injunctions? [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
John Does 1-50United States District Court for N.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Does 1–65, 2010 WL 4055667 (U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:56 am
Does 1-9, 2008 U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Does 1-41, and 3 other cases, under caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies", which ordered the RIAA to cease and desist from that practice, but which the RIAA has simply ignored for the past 2 1/2 years, just in case anyone's thinking of making a contempt motion:November 17, 2004, Order, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:59 am
Does 1–3757, 2011 U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
John Doe, 2013 WL 363016 (9thCir. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:16 am
Does 1-22, Dkt No. 07-00057. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:25 am
Does 1-16, a case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, John Doe #3 has filed papers seeking to overturn the decision of the Magistrate Judge denying his motion to quash and to vacate.Declaration of Richard A. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:14 am
A George Washington University student, known only as "John Doe #3", has made a motion to vacate the RIAA's ex parte discovery order, quash the subpoena issued pursuant to the order, and to dismiss the complaint, in Arista v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:03 am
Does 1-16, a "John Doe" case targeting students at the State University of New York at Albany, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued a stay of the RIAA subpoena and all proceedings during the pendency of John Doe #3's appeal.This is a case in which several John Does had moved to quash the subpoena, vacate the ex parte discovery order, and dismiss the complaint.The motion to… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Does 1-11, the District Court has granted the defendant John Doe #9's motion for severance, and severed as to Doe #9 and all other defendants except John Doe #1.District Judge Kathleen O'Malley rejected the RIAA's argument that severance was premature, agreed with the authorities that had granted severance, and dismissed the authorities cited by the RIAA as providing insufficient analysis,… [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al.CALKINS, J.[ ¶1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett Flannery's motions to dismiss, and dismissing Doe's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:02 am
Does 1-17, the case targeting George Washington University, defendant John Doe #3 has filed his response to the RIAA's response to the Order to Show Cause issued by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.Response to RIAA response** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->Slashdot this story! [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
I'd be willing to bet John O'Connor's income tax refund against it. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:54 am
Thus, the more time passes in John Doe’s case without (1) knowing who he is; (2) providing him with access to counsel; or (3) allowing the courts to even review the legality of his detention, the more alarmed I am by the government’s conduct—and the more alarmed you (and Ben) should be, too. [read post]
